Police Intentional Breach of Duty
![]()
Although Timothy filed several criminal complaints with the El Mirage police, the governor and the attorney general of Arizona, the following statement is extracted from his certified criminal complaint filed in the El Mirage Municipal Court. The document was dated February 26, 2024.
Summary of Key Points:
Criminal Complaint & Legal Motion: Timothy filed a certified criminal complaint related to his protection order and children's abduction, citing police misconduct and failure to enforce legal duties.
Protective Order & Kidnapping Incident:
- A protective order was issued on April 6, 2023, prohibiting the defendant mother from approaching her three children.
- Despite this, on January 9, 2024, the babysitter forcibly transported the children to an unknown location and handed them over to the defendant mother.
-At the time, the father (Timothy) was hospitalized in ICU that day, and upon returning home, found his children gone.
Police Involvement & Negligence:
- El Mirage and later, the Mesa Police were aware of the protective order but failed to enforce it.
- The babysitter, arrested on unrelated charges, had no authority to take the children.
- El Mirage Police failed to retrieve the children even though they knew where they were but failed to respond even after service of the protective order on the defendant mother, who actively defied it and kept the children.
- Officer Ryden of the Mesa Police allegedly visited the defendant mother and even threatened Timothy.
Legal & Procedural Manipulations:
- The defendant mother obtained another protective order against Timothy in a different court, allegedly to obstruct his lawful access to the children.
- Despite knowing of the protective order against the mother acquired by Timothy, law enforcement failed to enforce and instead attempted to serve Timothy with a fraudulent order obtained by the defendant, then abandoned service after notice of Timothy's existing order.
Ongoing Violations & Accountability Issues:
- Timothy's court filing claimed law enforcement were complicit in the ongoing deprivation of his rights and failure to protect his children.
- The case involves allegations of custodial interference, child endangerment, and police misconduct including civil rights violations of due process.
See Protective Orders Have No Guarantee
Latest Posts
- Motion to Vacate May 28, 2026, Void Order
- First Amendment Complaint (FAC)
- Emergency Motions to Rescue Children
- Judge Ordered Kids to Stay with KidnappersAfter the Kidnapping and Death of Their Father, Federal Judge Susan M. Brnovich Followed the Defendant Officials in Keeping the Children with Their Captors… Read more: Judge Ordered Kids to Stay with Kidnappers
- Understanding Common vs. Statutory LawWhat is the Distinction between Common and Statutory Law? One significant distinction between common law and statutory law lies in the source of authority.… Read more: Understanding Common vs. Statutory Law
- Understanding ‘Shall’ and ‘May’ in Child Safety LegislationLegal terminology plays a crucial role in the interpretation and application of laws. It comprises the specific language and words utilized within the legal… Read more: Understanding ‘Shall’ and ‘May’ in Child Safety Legislation
- Custodial Interference or Kidnapping: A Father’s FightIn the Stone’s ongoing legal proceedings highlighted in the complaints, an alarming factor emerged: a communication from the chief of police, which indicated that… Read more: Custodial Interference or Kidnapping: A Father’s Fight
- The Human Cost of Family AbductionIntroduction to the Stones' Case The case of Reverend John W. Stone and Shirley D. Stone emerged in federal court as a poignant illustration… Read more: The Human Cost of Family Abduction
- Understanding the Legal RelationshipAt the center of this federal court action is the legal relationship between the plaintiffs, Reverend John W. Stone and Shirley D. Stone, and… Read more: Understanding the Legal Relationship
- The Human Impact Shown in Stone’s Emergency FilingThe human impact is demonstrated in the emergency motion filed by Reverend John W. Stone and Shirley D. Stone in the Federal Court. The… Read more: The Human Impact Shown in Stone’s Emergency Filing













